Creating a political momentum for global food governance

To feed the world's population in 2050, "the fine art of governance" is required, according to Jan Grossarth. With the help of the SEWOH partners, he has shed light on what this art includes and what challenges it encounters.

All 193 delegates of the United Nations agreed in January 2016 on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are based on the MDGs and should be achieved by 2030 ©GIZ/Horst M. Vogel

Dr. Jan Grossarth

Dr Jan Grossarth is a freelance journalist and book author. His main topics are ecology, agriculture, food security and related social issues. After having worked as a senior editor at the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, he was head of communications at the Federal Ministry of Agriculture (BMEL) in 2019. Since 2020, he has worked as a freelance journalist for "Die Welt", "Jüdische Allgemeine", among others, and is a research associate in a project on bioeconomy at LMU Munich.

There has been some modest progress everywhere and in many thousands of local projects. But what if this won’t be enough in view of the global challenge? According to UN forecasts, Africa’s population is set to double by 2050, reaching over two billion people. Yet food imports on the continent are already exceeding exports, so it is not providing enough food for itself. Climate forecasts are predicting that in some African (and Asian) regions average temperatures will rise by 3 degrees or more. Moreover, deserts are spreading, with the prospect that development cooperation will be ineffective if it merely distributes resources under the watering can principle.

 

This indicates a real need for political coordination, both nationally and internationally. In fact, prioritising a global food policy should be just as urgent as a climate policy. This task, however, is made far more complicated by competition between the two UN goals of reducing greenhouse gases, on the one hand, and of increasing food production, on the other.

 

But while there is a clear way forward that would reconcile “production” and the “environment” (agroecology), while also achieving an increase in added value, we are faced with some major vagueness when we probe into the political efforts that are required for effective implementation. Instead of “watering cans”, we really need technical and political quantum leaps that will bring about (1) a sustainable increase in productivity, (2) a sustainable transformation of the global food system (does it actually exist, or are there perhaps several?) and (3) an increase in the purchasing power of the poor in the Global South. It would take billions in investment and, above all, political engagement.

 

There’s a real need for the fine art of governance, with the political coordination of different interests and a clear focus on a joint vision.

 

These vary significantly from one country to another, and also from one province to another. We may of course ask whether the global food supply and issues of the food system are actually treated as a high priority in many of the affected African and Asian countries. Local newspapers in sub-Saharan countries – always keenly interested in agriculture – tend to get bogged down in reports on harvests, statistical issues concerning the delivery of fertilisers, weather reports and the politically embellished claptrap of associations about a rosy future. In fact, is there any major openness in Africa's big cities to face up to their own issues of food insecurity?

 

Since 2017, the EnD SARS movement has been campaigning against police violence and poor governance in the country. The protesters organize mainly through social networks © Unspash / Tope A Asokere

On the other hand, it is equally true that in most industrially developed countries, global food security is given no priority either in politics or in the media. The causes and potential solutions are too multifaceted, and there is no “narrative of blame” that might mobilise the masses the way it mobilises them for climate change and for global environmental issues. But this is not how the media work, and certainly not the “social” media. For an issue to be newsworthy, it needs to be clear and simple. The same is true on the world’s stock exchanges where Green Finance is currently an important buzzword, but where the global food supply is treated as less important. Sustainable energies and sustainable mobility hit the headlines, but not investments in agroforestry plantations. Any political focus or coordination of this issue seems highly unlikely. But how could such a momentum be created?

 

Certainly not solely through the intense efforts of specialist politicians or indeed simply through the work of hundreds of scientists, citizens’ initiatives and one-world sales. It would probably require some all-encompassing media attention with extremely striking symbols, images and metaphors that drive home the magnitude of the impending disaster, while at the same time showing clearly that ordinary citizens will be impacted. The issue of combating hunger needs to be clearly perceived as a global issue, and for the Global North this means, above all, perceiving it as a human rights issue and an issue of migration.

 

Political momentum is a mystery: it often seems as though political momentum had a will of its own. Any historical events and images relating to an issue add up to people’s collective memories. Occasionally a further event occurs, which then triggers groundbreaking political decisions. One example is Greta Thunberg’s climate protest which preceded the European Green Deal, turning climate and sustainability issues into unprecedented political priorities. Suddenly a major target was on the agenda: climate neutrality of the EU by 2050. Restructuring of the economy. Under free market principles, but with all the legal leverage of the regulatory system. The images of polar bears perishing among the melting ice and all the climate conferences were not forgotten. Yet it was Greta Thunberg – an iconic figure – who helped this issue to achieve its large-scale breakthrough, cutting through all arguments and defensive barriers. It required passion, consternation, pleading and a childlike gaze that could not easily be ignored.

 

The Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg is known as the brain and the icon of the Fridays for Future movement, which promoted the issue of climate change to the top of the priority list of European countries © picture alliance/abaca

Can there be a Greta Thunberg of the world food supply? And what might she say? The faces of hunger and malnutrition have been the hallmark of non-political fundraising for many decades now. Adequate and healthy nutrition for all would take so much more. More crops, more growth and more trade. All in harmony with the conservation of resources. Should the Greta Thunberg of the world food supply say: “Transform the global food system”? Oh dear.

 

It seems as if development policy is caught up in the shackles of its own jargon, which is scientific yet always a notch too technocratic. Well, this isn’t going to produce much momentum. Rather, the momentum always comes suddenly and unexpectedly. In Germany it came in 2015, along with millions of Syrians, Afghans and Africans who suddenly migrated to Germany. All of a sudden, development policy became item no. 1 on the political agenda. The German federal government increased the budget of its Development Ministry “to combat reasons for migration” by 80 per cent. Then, the focus shifted more onto domestic policy.

 

If no permanent momentum can be created, it is nevertheless possible to ensure at least greater efficiency in the coordination of interests – through governance.

 

This means managing and controlling heterogeneous interests with a focus on a common goal. For this to succeed, intermediaries are needed – organisations that mediate, facilitate, interpret and clarify matters between science, policymakers, the economy, the media and civil society. When it comes to climate issues, this is the success story of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which sees itself not as a scientific institution, but as an organisation that gives a voice to science and adds impact and “non-partisan” legitimacy to political messages. The IPCC seems more agile than the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), which is influenced by a large number of state interests. In this role, the IPCC helped to put a “science-based” figure at the political centre of world climate policy: the 1.5 degree target. Yet there is no IPCC for a world food policy, nor any symbolical number. The 50 to 70 per cent increase in production, which – according to the FAO – will be needed by the middle of the century, is only known to experts. Both a world food IPCC and a world food one-point-five would be extremely helpful.

 

A billboard in Beijing promotes the China-Africa Summit. Around 50 African countries attended the summit in 2018 © picture-alliance/dpa

After the United States, Germany is the largest national donor of development aid – but can one country alone set the tone? Or is China being more effective with its grand, autocratically motivated method of industrialisation which it is pursuing in Africa out of its strong self-interest? China is investing billions in loans, building roads, railway lines and airports in large parts of Africa, using mainly its own workers. The rolling stock that moves along them is primarily crops and raw materials, heading towards China, in particular.

 

Western concepts of governance, on the other hand, are based on solutions involving numerous different parties. There are countless variations, and it’s not a matter of “one size fits all”. What all of them have in common is that they bring together heterogeneous interests under a single goal. “Similar to the previous terms – ‘political planning’ and ‘political control’ – ‘governance’ has become quite a catch-all in political science now,” says the sociologist Uwe Schimank from the University of Bremen. The purpose is to find order, to set priorities and to ensure coherence beyond the organisational forms of “hierarchies” and “markets”.

 

In other words, governance organises not just planned progress, but also creative progress.

 

It maintains autonomy in parts of society – law, economy, politics, culture and religion. It avoids the pitfalls of disintegration, caused by overburdening its participants, and it also avoids the pitfalls of excessive integration (with everyone focused on a “single goal”), a situation which – sociologically speaking – paralyses the specific strengths of parts of society.

 

One specific and crucial example is the issue of land rights and land policies. This concerns the question of property rights, rights of use and access rights, in other words: thorny issues of material distribution. If the various interests cannot be coordinated here, then all the various “watering can” activities will basically be pointless. Property rights, investment propensity and the development of agriculture and villages are all closely connected. An effective development policy requires secure access rights to both land and resources. As long as property and land use issues remain unresolved, technical progress cannot develop its full impact. The German policy advisor Alexander Müller, who has worked for the FAO and the UN in this area in many senior roles, says: “As long as land use rights are unresolved, the problems can’t be solved through block chain developments, either.”

 

Greenhouses, fruit plantations and vegetable fields near Agadir in Morocco. The country is one of the biggest fruit and vegetable producers in Africa © picture alliance /JOKER

The current situation is disgraceful: according to a study by the World Bank in 2015, three quarters of the world’s population have no legally secured land rights. For Africa, the figure that has been circulating is 90 per cent or more (World Bank 2013). As a rule, there are only verbal agreements or traditional rights.

 

There is a fundamental lack of land registers and of fully functioning land markets. All this would need to change as a matter of urgency. However, the various parties are not exerting any political pressure. Private foundations often have a technical focus on specific health issues, such as the fight against diseases like malaria, or a focus on certain sociopolitical issues, such as increasing school attendance. Although the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is calling for a reform of land rights under a “Marshall Plan for Africa”, this point seems to be getting lost among so many others. And what about the level of motivation among the actual African governments? Is there any incentive for them to enter into a tough battle for precious land with influential landowners?

 

Here, governance primarily means establishing certain commonalities of interest. Who might be taken on board? What might be the interest of a traditional elite in setting up a land register or the interest of a village elder who is worried about losing power? Farmers and their organisations would certainly be on board. And when it comes to different departments, alliances on this issue may also have an impact on climate policies and gender equality policies. After all, the resolution of land rights correlates closely with more sustainable and therefore more climate-friendly management. This was the result of a 2018 meta-study carried out by Daniel Higgins et al. from the International Fund for Agricultural Development. According to the study, the formalisation of land rights also leads to improvements in the legal position of women. One vision might be to provide economic investment incentives through an improvement of the land right issue, while at the same time improving climate protection and achieving gender equality. The latter would also lead to a drop in birth rates.

 

Governance is based on shared visions, and those visions should prevent the many actors from getting tangled up in the minutiae of their interests and their worries about losing out.

 

This problem was also mentioned by the World Bank in 2013 when it wrote: “Efforts to improve land governance are often paralysed by technical complexities, institutional fragmentation, entangled interests and a lack of shared vision.”

 

After Namibia's independence in 1991, land reforms were passed that were supposed to lead to a more equitable redistribution of wealth and resources. But until today, the land issue is still a problem of national concern © GIZ / R.Bäcker 

Once a vision has been formulated and communicated, cooperation ideally unfolds its fullest impact. A 2021 paper by sustainability researcher Nicola Favretto from the University of Leeds lists the various success factors: cooperation, building on existing alliances, taking the historical context into account, neutral facilitation, transparency and the use of digital tools such as the software Sensemaker. After all, “sense” is by no means always unanimous, and governance is not a harmonious circle of chairs. We can look at two examples of conflicts that arose after participatory decisions were made. In Zimbabwe, there was an increase in the number of wild elephants after the designation of a protected area, whereas the income of the local population declined. In Ghana, the designation of protected areas caused conflict between the population and local officials. If, however, there is a culture of dialogue, it is also possible to discuss compensation.

 

In many cases, if a land ownership issue is controversial, then there is at least the option of formalising the rights of use. In Zambia, for instance, this is often precisely what needs doing, says Nsama Chikolwa, a local SEWOH project partner. And in Uganda, the land use issue is even more controversial compared with sparsely populated Zambia, as the country has a population density of 213 per square kilometre. This is quite high compared with other African countries, as Uganda also had over 1.4 million refugees in 2020. Moreover, land investors are buying large areas of land, whereas the amount of Ugandan land that is formally registered and officially listed amounts to less than 10 per cent. As long as this is the case, people have no option but to get their land use rights testified by neighbours or village elders.

 

In one project, GIZ and local institutions are working to promote formal land ownership rights and land use rights. The governance strategy of the project is to first inform local civil society, but also land investors and the population itself about the issue and the legal situation and to familiarise them with the FAO’s Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT). Conducting numerous interviews, experts have been determining the current land use patterns in the villages, writing them down and surveying the relevant plots of land. It’s a start. Even such simple land documents enable farmers to obtain small loans for investment in their land, says GIZ. Similar projects exist in Peru, where around 30 per cent of the country’s indigenous communities still do not have any formal land rights.

 

Self-help groups are an important part of nutrition governance. They are the basis for social and political empowerment of female smallholders © GIZ/Nitya Agarwal

Multi-sectoral involvement also characterises projects to improve food security – with the participation of government ministries, private business and the local population. Felix Pensulo Phiri from Malawi, a SEWOH partner and civil servant in the Ministry of Health, speaks of a “new mindset” that now dominates through such modern governance principles in the food policy projects he is involved in. For several decades, he says, the only thing that happened was the cultivation of more maize and the promotion of higher-yield varieties and the necessary fertilisers and pesticides – “to feed the people”. Since 2004, however, the government has been putting its food policy on a broader footing, setting up various committees.

 

One outcome is apparently that everyone is learning from the perspective of others, changing the general mindset.

 

This is happening simply because shareholder-focused companies are suddenly involved in specific projects on human rights issues. The example from Malawi shows that political action is not limited to government action. The SEWOH initiative also included corporations such as Bayer and BASF on various local projects. Participants from several organisations expressed themselves positively about the experiences gained through this cooperation. “Everyone had to deliver something, and everyone had a constructive role,” said one of them. Subjective testimonies of this kind may sound like “soft” performance criteria in the face of “tough” challenges. Yet without motivation nothing would work at all. And the entrenched, knee-jerk antagonism between political parties, the economy and industry, has already frustrated a good deal of problem-solving motivation in the Western world.

Go back

Ähnliche Beiträge

The hope of development cooperation lays in innovation

Policy makers wish for innovation. But what is an innovation that truly takes Africa a step forward? With the support of the SEWOH partners, journalist Jan Grossarth took a critical look at the demand for innovation.

Is innovation a cure? A meaningless filler? Even problematic? And: In what way? Taking a critical post-colonial look at the past, the “innovation history” of Africa appears to be a double-edged sword, in any case. Historian Clapperton Chakanetsa Mavhunga, who teaches at MIT in the USA, deplores the failure and even largely destructive effect of “western” technology and knowledge exports to Africa. In his works about innovation in Africa, “capitalistic entrepreneurship” appears as “imperialism” in modified form and downright “parasitical” in its nature. A problematic definition of innovation, he says, has been transferred to Africa particularly from Europe. A definition that is limited to technical aspects, industrial scaling and commercial use.

Read more

From Space to Seed: Innovation for world nutrition

From crop forecasts out of space to resistant seeds: What ideas and technologies have been developed in recent years to revolutionize the world's nutrition? We present a selection of innovations that could be decisive in the fight against hunger.

Read more

The world needs empowered farmers!

The world needs empowered farmers! But what does that mean and how can it be organized? With the support of the SEWOH partners, journalist Jan Grossarth has gathered guiding thoughts on the topic in an article.

Organised agricultural lobbying is rare in industrialised nations. Is the political influence of certain interest groups that have excellent parliamentary connections and work quietly behind the scenes in aid of meat exports or biomass subsidies excessively large and insufficiently transparent? Such questions are a subject of discussion in Europe and the USA, but also in Brazil or Argentina. And for good reason. With regard to global food security another, to some extent countervailing question arises: how can “good lobbying” for the development interests of the world’s smallholders emerge? Would it not, after all, be widely beneficial, and also necessary in order to ensure a stable global food supply, if the hundreds of millions of local farmers in Africa and Asia were able to represent their income- and development-related interests more effectively in parliaments, the media and international organisations?

Read more

Agroecology: a global political guiding perspective?

Agroecology is a popular buzzword in food policy worldwide. It is based on a complex concept that journalist Jan Grossarth, with the support of the SEWOH partners, has examined and called into question.

Agroecology cannot be defined in one phrase. It would take some pages. As a political guiding perspective – perhaps because of its variety – it is suitable to pleasing everyone. The European Commission is relying on this approach as part of the Green Deal as its 10-year transformation plan, and the term is also mentioned in the Farm to Fork food strategy of the EU Commission. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has commissioned its leading experts from the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) to shed light on the approach in a 163-page report (the HLPE Report, 2019). The summary alone uses eleven key points in its definition. An agroecological approach, it says, “favours the use of natural processes, limits the use of external inputs, promotes closed cycles with minimal negative externalities and stresses the importance of local knowledge and participatory processes” – while also being designed to reduce social inequalities and to help the sciences to gain in importance. 

Read more

Agroecology at UN level: The FAO's Scaling up Agroecology Initiative

Growing scientific evidence and local experiences demonstrate how agroecology has the potential to offer a holistic response to the multiple and interrelated challenges facing food systems.

Read more

The garden of agroecology: A few real-life examples

The challenges of population growth, dwindling biodiversity and climate change require to rethink our current food systems and call for solution approaches in terms of an agroecological transformation.

Read more

Why the transformation of our food systems is imperative

Current crises highlight the need to transform food systems. Dr Sinclair, team leader of the World Food Security Committee, presents 13 agro-ecological principles that might be effective for change.

Read more

Ms Neubert, what is a trilemma? And what can be done about it?

In order to alleviate the trilemma of land use, the climate crisis, the destruction of biodiversity and the food crisis must be addressed simultaneously. Susanne Neubert explains in an interview what such strategies might look like.

Read more

Beyond your own field

An exchange program between the German Farmers' Association and the Andreas Hermes Academy for young German and Ugandan farmers shows: North-South cooperation works best at eye level. Four graduates report on what is possible when farmers learn from each other.

Read more

A globally popular export

"One for all, all for one" - this motto became the basis for action of agricultural cooperatives that were founded in the 19th century. They became a success story that will continue to be written well into the 21st century.

Read more

Meet the people: Joseph Ngaah

Joseph Ngaah is chairman of the Kakamega County Farmers Association in Kenya. Through his commitment at national and local level, he gives farmers a voice - both in the media and with political decision-makers. Within the SEWOH, he cooperates with the Andreas Hermes Academy, the Green Innovation Centers and TMG - Sustainable Think Tank.

Read more

Labels, customs tariffs and supply chain legislation: Do they benefit or harm smallholders?

In the discussion about sustainability in supply chains, European states focus on labels, customs tariffs and government regulations. With the support of the SEWOH partners, Jan Grossarth questions these measures.

After the eight-storey Rana Plaza factory collapsed in Bangladesh in April 2013, killing over a thousand textile workers under the rubble, the issue of human rights in sewing factories dominated global news for a few days. The initial shock turned into shame. After all, wasn’t everyone who bought cheap T-shirts and jeans somehow responsible? This was followed by a political debate: Hadn’t the disaster happened in a domain where the state, i.e. Bangladesh, should have ensured compliance with its laws? Or, on the other hand, do we not have a say in the regulations determining how the products we consume are manufactured? Not only through consumption, but through our government and companies?

Read more

Farmers in revolt-their movement brings unity and hope

Since 2014, a law has guaranteed all Indians sufficient healthy food at affordable prices. Now one of the biggest waves of protest in history is rocking the subcontinent. Farmers are fighting back against laws that abolish guaranteed minimum prices and put nutrition programmes in jeopardy.  

 

Read more

Drones for Inclusive Growth in Agriculture

BASF’s project Drones for Smallholder Farmers aims to build an inclusive business model that will facilitate access of smallholders to drones for spraying crop protection products. A report by Dr. Diana Moran.

Read more

The path from the greenhouse into practice

Innovative ideas like apps are popular showcases. But for the successful implementation of an innovation, thinking beyond the boundaries of projects is necessary. Lennart Woltering explains in an interview how to move from the greenhouse into practice.

Read more

Deforestation and ecosystem conversion: a strict EU legal framework is imperative

Christine Scholl, Senior Advisor at WWF Germany, explains why a binding and comprehensive EU regulation is crucial in avoiding deforestation and conversion of valuable ecosystems and what such legislation must take into account.

Read more

Banking on innovation and sustainability in the cocoa value chain

Juliette Kouassi founded the cocoa cooperative ABOUd'CAO in Côte d'Ivoire, which dismantles traditional role definitions. The aim is to promote women producers and "throw anything away in the cocoa value chain, by rendering value to everything."

Read more

We begins with you: Three propositions for consumer communication

Generation Z (1995-2010) is forcing manufacturers of consumer goods to rethink their production values. The “Greta effect” not only compels companies to act. It also promises great potential for development cooperation to reach its goals.  

Read more

The right to nutrition: how we can realise it

Stefan Schmitz is head of the Crop Trust and has been SEWOH Commissioner until 2019. We asked him which aspects of the SEWOH could be groundbreaking in order to achieve global goals such as SDG 2 at a national and a global level.

Read more

Supply chains: “The EU’s general principle is to support, not to punish”

Aside from the German Federal government, EU institutions are also encouraging the introduction of a supply chain law. What would be the consequences? Questions for Bettina Rudloff of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).

Read more

A masterplan for nutrition governance

Ending worldwide hunger by 2030 requires effective governance. This masterplan is based on the experience of the GIZ global programme for “Food and Nutrition Security, Enhanced Resilience,” which works on improving nutrition governance in ten countries around the world.

Read more

In the land of conflicts 

Land is the foundation of life for most Ugandans. In central Uganda, an ancient land tenure system has caused an impasse for both landlords and tenants hence causing conflicts for decades. An innovative approach to conflict solving, and awareness-raising is about to create change.

Read more

Global Hunger Index: Political action is the key

The World Hunger Index 2020 indicates that the goal of "Zero Hunger by 2030" will not be met. Miriam Wiemers, leading expert for the World Hunger Index, traces the main challenges and describes how the path to Zero Hunger can be taken.

Read more

Genetic engineering, fertilisers and agricultural chemicals - conflicting perspectives

Is modern genetic engineering an innovative answer for ensuring global food supply? And what about fertilisers and agricultural chemicals? Felix Prinz zu Löwenstein believes all three are part of the problem. Matthias Berninger thinks rejecting these new technologies is a risky ideological proposition. A debate.

Read more

How the Green Innovation Centre in Mali backs women in the San lowlands

Proper nutrition. An adequate diet. Higher incomes and more employment in rural areas. These are the goals of the 15 Green Innovation Centres established in Africa and Asia on behalf of the BMZ. But how are these goals put into practice in Bamako, Mali?

Read more

Babban Gona's holistic financing approach

What are innovative financing mechanisms and how can financing help to scale innovations? Kola Masha, Managing Director of Babban Gona explains his holistic business model, which he built up in Nigeria with financial help and support from the German KfW.

Read more

Even innovations take their time

Some good ideas never become reality. It takes patience, long-term thinking and the courage to learn from mistakes. Based on a conversation with software developer Simon Riedel, journalist Jan Rübel focused on the challenges of innovation in an international development context.

Read more

Why successful transformation needs strong governance?

The special initiative One World no hunger (SEWOH) is one donor nation's attempt to decisively push forward the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2). Observations and conclusions from the accompanying discourse.

In the summer of 2019, António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN), raised the alarm on the growing number of people going hungry. A “World Food Systems Summit” (UNFSS) in the autumn of 2021 intends to draw the necessary public attention to the issue of combatting hunger and increasing sustainability and provide fresh impetus for transforming the entire food system. In 2014, Germany’s Federal Minister of Economic Cooperation and Development, Gerd Müller, launched a remarkable experiment: SEWOH, the Special Initiative ONEWORLD No Hunger. The idea was to drastically advance UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2) with a sector approach initially driven by a single donor nation. Germany has invested around 1.5 billion euros annually towards achieving the UN goal, becoming the world’s second-largest donor in the fields of food security, rural development and agriculture. The initiative has explored new possibilities, yet it also had to face its limits. Vastly exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, it had to realise the vulnerabilities of global food security.  

Read more

Climate change affects everyone, but not equally

Claudia Ringler, Deputy Division Director of EPTD at IFPRI, describes the adverse impacts of climate change and its related risks on populations in poor countries. What can be done to reduce the impact of climate change on food and nutrition security?

Read more

Climate crises

Population growth, lawlessness and dwindling resources, accelerated by climate change, are leading to conflicts that leave thousands dead across the Sahel every year. "Many will leave their homelands or perish from hunger, disease or wars. Only rapid socioeconomic development [...] would be able to prevent this disaster."

Read more

Securing Land Rights

Unresolved land ownership and rights of utilisation contribute to hunger and poverty and lead to conflicts over land, especially in Africa. The SEWOH therefore promotes various approaches to eliminate conflicts over land and to ensure responsible and sustainable agricultural land use.

Read more